Nookipedia talk:Special Character standard
Regarding the standardization of special character articles
Hey guys, first off, I didn't know we had such a page until today. That said, since last year, I have been working very slowly in my Sandbox on a new standard for special characters, with Tom Nook being my test subject (though Kicks can also be found there as well). If everything comes out the way I hope it does, I will set up a Project Special Character, similar to Project Furniture. Just thought I should let everyone know. Thanks! --XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk) 23:06, July 16, 2015 (EDT)
- Good to now! I didn't realize this page existed either. It's a good thing I decided to bring it to light. Hope whatever you come up is better than this! Good luck.
™ 23:58, July 16, 2015 (EDT) - Sounds cool- and nice work so far. Feel free to update this page when you're ready.
(talk) 13:11, July 17, 2015 (EDT)
Rewrite or delete?
(talk) 14:11, October 18, 2020 (EDT)- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This page doesn't serve much purpose and is so poorly written that only experienced users familiar with MediaWiki will be able to understand it. It desperately needs a rewrite - otherwise it can probably be deleted or archived. Any thoughts? Red (snappity snap snap!) 
14:29, November 10, 2015 (EST)
- I have no qualms about you deleting this page. I haven't had much time to continue my revamp of Tom Nook's article, which I am hoping, when complete, will serve as a basis for special character articles, but I will soon now that marching band is over. --XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk) 16:13, November 10, 2015 (EST)
- This page probably better belongs in a project space, but since SNES has shown interest in developing the page, I'll hold on until we see some changes or at least gets reformatted and put into a project. ™ 19:26, November 10, 2015 (EST)
- This page probably better belongs in a project space, but since SNES has shown interest in developing the page, I'll hold on until we see some changes or at least gets reformatted and put into a project.
Reviving this to say this page is horribly outdated and poorly written, and it has not been updated in the nearly five years since this discussion began (in fact, the majority of this page was written in 2010). Maybe it could be rewritten and added to Project Villager, but as it stands now it qualifies for deletion. ~ AlexBot2004 (Talk) 14:49, September 22, 2020 (EDT)
- This page should have never been placed in the Nookipedia namespace until it was finished, and even then it's better suited for Project Villager, as you've suggested. Additionally, any recommendations or guidelines listed here are outdated. I
Support deletion. (talk) 11:47, September 23, 2020 (EDT) - Support I dabbled in standardizing special character pages years ago, back when Project Villager was dormant. I think that some of my work on the topic is still in my sandbox. However, since Project Villager is active now, I think that incorporating special character pages as a branch of that is our best option. BladeofEvilsBane (talk) 13:54, September 23, 2020 (EDT)
- Support, per others. --Jake (talk) 15:07, September 23, 2020 (EDT)
- Support. vmario97 (talk) 15:57, September 23, 2020 (EDT)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
