Difference between revisions of "Community talk:Animal Crossing Community"
From Nookipedia, the Animal Crossing wiki
m (Text replace - "animalcrossingwiki.me" to "nookipedia.com") |
MerrytonRyan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::::Users can't edit them without a commitment to the site. That's the purpose of autoconfirmation and our patrolling team. I think we'll be fine. --[[User:Jake|<span style="color:#008000;font-weight:bold;">Ja</span>]][[User_talk:Jake|<span style="color:#E58900;font-weight:bold;">ke</span>]] 17:59, 21 November 2010 (EST) | ::::::Users can't edit them without a commitment to the site. That's the purpose of autoconfirmation and our patrolling team. I think we'll be fine. --[[User:Jake|<span style="color:#008000;font-weight:bold;">Ja</span>]][[User_talk:Jake|<span style="color:#E58900;font-weight:bold;">ke</span>]] 17:59, 21 November 2010 (EST) | ||
:::::::I do to, but these are still likely targets for spam/advertising. '''''[[User:SuperAlpaca|<font color="OliveDrab">Super</font>]]''''' <sup><small>''([[User Talk:SuperAlpaca|<font color="DarkSlateBlue">duh...</font>]])''</small></sup>'''''[[Special:Editcount/SuperAlpaca|<font color="SteelBlue">Alpaca</font>]]'''''[[File:Doggie Mask.gif|link=Special:Contributions/SuperAlpaca]] 18:07, 21 November 2010 (EST) | :::::::I do to, but these are still likely targets for spam/advertising. '''''[[User:SuperAlpaca|<font color="OliveDrab">Super</font>]]''''' <sup><small>''([[User Talk:SuperAlpaca|<font color="DarkSlateBlue">duh...</font>]])''</small></sup>'''''[[Special:Editcount/SuperAlpaca|<font color="SteelBlue">Alpaca</font>]]'''''[[File:Doggie Mask.gif|link=Special:Contributions/SuperAlpaca]] 18:07, 21 November 2010 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==COPPA== | ||
+ | Not intentionally being rude but I like how the US are profitting from children using websites :P I've never heard of this before, it's completely different to how the UK treat online users! - [[User:MerrytonRyan|MerrytonRyan]] 19:51, 23 January 2011 (EST) |
Revision as of 20:51, January 23, 2011
Should this really be a page? I mean... it's about a fansite... 50 pxNintendoLover is AWESOME! You knew that! 16:48, 21 November 2010 (EST)
- I'm not entirely on board with this, but there is an ongoing project related to the creation of pages for fansites. --Jake 16:52, 21 November 2010 (EST)
- Oops, didn't see your post Jake. Would this not be better as a template or something on the main page? I'm not sure a page would really work, as the articles should be more AC based rather than advertising space. Will check out the thread though. - MerrytonRyan 17:36, 21 November 2010 (EST)
- That's fine. I've restored the article. I'm not sure if this deserves an article either. Maybe we should just consolidate all of them into one page? --Jake 17:40, 21 November 2010 (EST)
- Only problem is you might get people with small fansites attempting to use a page like to for their websites - it might create a messy precedent :P Perhaps we should stick to "Official" sites and very popular sites? I'm sure we had a page of some sort for that already. The page would need to be locked to avoid random adds and edits though. - MerrytonRyan 17:46, 21 November 2010 (EST)
- I recommended semi-protecting all of these fansite articles. Only auto-confirmed users would be able to edit them, effectively preventing advertising. What do you think? --Jake 17:49, 21 November 2010 (EST)
- Oops, didn't see your post Jake. Would this not be better as a template or something on the main page? I'm not sure a page would really work, as the articles should be more AC based rather than advertising space. Will check out the thread though. - MerrytonRyan 17:36, 21 November 2010 (EST)
COPPA
Not intentionally being rude but I like how the US are profitting from children using websites :P I've never heard of this before, it's completely different to how the UK treat online users! - MerrytonRyan 19:51, 23 January 2011 (EST)