Template talk:Sloth

Template:ArchiveTalk In my opinion, templates with only one character in them, like this one and others, serve little use here. Any ideas on an existing template that we could merge them with? The species pages for only one animal aren't much use either. Red (talk) 11:37, July 21, 2015 (EDT)

All of the navboxes with very few characters in them already appear in the special characters navbox (someone please correct me if I'm wrong). I think they should just be removed. (talk) 16:23, July 21, 2015 (EDT)

Rule of thumb is that navboxes should contain at least 3 or 4 entries or else they're pretty useless. This should be deleted, since its only purpose is for consistency with other special species templates. I prefer if we just nix stuff like "otters", "weasels", "gulls", etc. until we get more of these characters. ™ 17:31, July 21, 2015 (EDT)

I agree that the navboxs are pretty much redundant as of right now, since many contain only one entry. However, I do think a page for each of the species represented by the special characters is nice to have. Most of our species pages, even those for normal villager species, are short, lacking in content. However, I do have an idea as to how we could possibly increase their longevity. --XXSuperXXNintendoXx (talk) 01:51, July 22, 2015 (EDT)